Thursday, January 5, 2012

DePuy Hip Recall Triggers Flood of Lawsuits


Last month, an analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales found that all-metal hips were failing early at three times the rate of those made from metal and plastic. Earlier this year, the agency said it had received around 5,000 adverse event reports related to all-metal hip replacements since January, more than it received in the previous four years combined. The majority involved the recently recalled DePuy ASR hip implant. Carrie Patrizi filed a DePuy hip lawsuit against DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services in the Eastern District of Texas, alleging the company knew the ASR XL Acetabular Hip Replacement devices were prone to fail within two years, even though the device is promoted as lasting over 15 years.
Patrizi had hip replacement surgery in 2009 and the defendants voluntarily recalled the ASR devices in 2010. In the lawsuit, Patrizi said she would not have had the implant if she had known that she would have to undergo a second surgery to remove the hip replacement. According to the lawsuit, Patrizi accuses DePuy and J&J of negligent misrepresentation, intentional misrepresentation, negligence, design defect, strict products liability, inadequate warning, failure to adequately test, failure to conform to representation, breach of express warranty, fraudulent concealment, and breach of implied warranty. It appears that the complications with the DePuy ASR hip may be linked to defects in the design of the hip implant. Orthopedic experts have suggested that the component has a narrow window for proper placement, which could explain the higher-than-expected DePuy ASR hip failure rate when compared with other types of hip replacement implants.
DePuy Hip Lawsuit Proceedings
Patrizi is seeking damages for bodily impairment, medical expenses, loss of earnings, loss of consortium, disfigurement, pain and suffering, mental anguish, emotional distress, punitive damages, attorney’s fees, interest and court costs. Patrizi may have a strong case based on the fact that she received an ASR hip transplant and that the transplant was removed, now giving her physical evidence of the defective hip. The vast majority of these reports (over 90% of those reported in 2009) involved the need for a surgical hip revision after a DePuy ASR hip replacement.